There’s always a proof text when you need one

Standard

Dan McPeek has very kindly suggested a link to a HuffPo article by an atheist Muslim. It’s entitled “An Atheist Muslim’s Perspective on the ‘Root Causes’ of Islamist Jihadism and the Politics of Islamophobia,” and it gives good reasons for thinking that Islamism is not a product of American imperialism, as is often suggested. It refers to a treaty between the United States and the Muslim Barbary states of North Africa signed into law in 1797, based on original negotiations by Thomas Jefferson, then American Ambassador to France. This is, just to put it in a historical context, before Napoleon’s invasion of Egypt, the building of the Suez Canal, the British and French carving up of the Ottoman Empire following the First World War: events which are often thought to be flashpoints for the current relationships between the Muslim world and the West. It’s worth reading just to get things into perspective.

It is also only fair to point out (in a bit of potted history) that Imperial Islam engaged in capturing and selling European slaves in the slave markets of North Africa and the Middle East, and had a lively trade in African slaves long before Europeans became embroiled in the slave trade. Whole villages from parts of the British Isles, including Ireland, were captured and sold in the slave markets of Algiers. According to Wikipedia, the Crimean Khanate had a brisk slave trade with the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East. In a process known as “the harvesting of the Steppes” Slav people were captured and sold in Muslim slave markets. (Memories of these markets still exist in the Yemen, where recently it was proposed that captured women be sold for use as concubines, which would solve the problem of infidelity by Muslim husbands! It would be hard to make this stuff up!) Thousands were taken from Moscow itself for use in this trade.

The frequent accusation that European colonialism is responsible for the present evils of the world ignores completely the fact that for hundreds of years Muslim imperial expansion gobbled up the entire territory of Eastern Christianity in the Middle East, Persia, Afghanistan and India, North Africa, Spain, Sicily, and, eventually, Constantinople and the Balkans, before Muslim imperial adventures were halted in France (at the Battle of Tours in 762), and at the very gates of Vienna (in 1529!), and that Imperial Islam engaged freely, not only in colonial expansion, but in the capture and use of slaves from conquered peoples, as well as from raiding parties in continental Europe as well as the British Isles. While not justifying the bitter hatreds and the genocides in the former Yugoslavia, it must be remembered that for centuries Muslims comprised the dominant power in the Balkans, to whom the Serbs and others were subservient. Indeed, an example of this subservience can be seen in the practice of scouring the Sultan’s Christian subjects for strong boys who would, at the age of 12 be given to Muslim families, where they were indoctrinated into Islam and trained as Janissaries, an elite corps of the Sultan’s bodyguards. Many Janissaries rose to high position in the Ottoman Empire, but they were still a sign and symbol of subservience and the status of Christians and other religious minorities as al-Dhimma, the people of the Dhimma, that is, contract status as tolerated aliens in return for payment of a tax (essentially, protection money). The bitterness of the war in Chechnya is partly the result of the long period during which Russians paid tribute money and provided slaves for the Muslim Tatars, and their eventual victory over them and their subjection to Russian rule. Such historical memories run very deep.

Foregoing added on Friday, 24th May, at 20.36 Atlantic Time ——————-

I was going to ignore the outrageous beheading of a British officer soldier, Drummer Lee Rigby, on the streets of London by Muslim fanatics, a form of “individualised” jihad which seems to be becoming more attractive to Muslim radicals who seem no longer to have large jihadi organisations able to organise and carry out more ambitious attacks on infidels. However, Medhi Hasan — he of the encounter with Richard Dawkins who scoffed at Hasan’s belief in winged horses (or mules) and Muhammad’s night journey to Jerusalem and then through the seven heavenly realms — who is now the political director of Huffington Post UK, decided to weigh in with the declaration that the men who carried out the atrocity in Woolwich were acting contrary to Muslim teachings. For it says, Hasan tells us, in the Qur’an, that he who kills one man is as if he had killed all mankind, and he cites chapter and verse in doing so, concluding with the ringing pronouncement that:

Thus, the two supposedly Muslim men suspected of killing and mutilating an unarmed, off-duty soldier in the middle of a London street, while shouting “Allahu Akbar” (“God is Great”), were violating the injunction of their own holy book.

Hasan goes on to approve Prime Minister Cameron’s declaration that

Wednesday’s barbarism was “a betrayal of Islam and of the Muslim communities who give so much to our country”.

But we have a right, I think, to ask whether it is plausible to suppose that what these “barbarians” did was in fact contrary to the teachings of Islam, a religion which, historically, is blighted by events such as this, and continues to issue in barbarously cruel acts designed (so it seems) to terrify people into submission to the dictates of God’s last messenger.

Continue reading

About these ads

Campaign for assisted dying gains ground, but is still widely misunderstood even by those who are campaigning for it

Standard

The campaign for assisted dying gains ground around the world. In Australia, the legislature in New South Wales is debating assisted dying legislation; some British religious leaders (Christian and Jewish) have come out in opposition to the position of their leaders and their religions’ official stand on assisted dying; in Vermont the Governor has signed an assisted dying law into force that went through the normal legislative procedure. All these are good signs, and to be encouraged.

However, I am still troubled by the idea that assisted dying for the terminally ill is a satisfactory form of assisted dying legislation, and I am dismayed that organisations like Dignity in Dying in England, and Compassion and Choices in the United States, are content to consider, as sound, assisted dying legislation in which a terminal prognosis of 6 months to a year is required before someone is eligible for assistance in dying. (I wrote a note to Sarah Wootton regarding this, but have not received a response.)

There are two major problems with such legislation, and it is high time that people recognised them for what they are.

Continue reading

Radical Islamic Violence or Anomie and Self-Radicalisation?

Standard

I find that, despite myself, I cannot remain entirely silent, so if there are still some of you out there still interested, I will doubtless add slowly to the sum of my posts after all! Blogging gets into your blood, and when you can no longer express yourself, it seems that the urge to do so is overwhelming!

I am still concerned about Islam, and the misunderstanding that seems to be widespread about the dangers of this religion. Of course, I understand that some people, like Rahman, will immediately say that Islam is made up of as many different belief systems as there are Muslims, but this is a way of avoiding the subject of the religion itself, as some sort of a unity, despite its lack of a centre of authority. Indeed, the fact that it lacks a central authority, aside from the central role that the Qur’an, the Sira and the Sharia play in Muslim life and belief, may serve to make Islam more, and not less dangerous, precisely because there is no way of controlling the most extreme forms of the religion, forms which are, in fact, endorsed by those central texts and traditions. And while Rahman and Paxton continue to struggle over the proofs for the existence of God — a completely hopeless task which has no end, and no very clear parameters either — Islam carries out its nefarious business in the world.

Now, someone will doubtless suggest that speaking about Islam’s “nefarious business” is itself Islamophobic, but this would be simply to misunderstand the religion itself, which obviously includes a significantly large fundamentalist radical dimension, whether all Muslims share it or not. It has to be remembered that Muhammad was a warlord, and not a particularly nice one at that, commending all sorts of wicked acts against his unbelieving neighbours, and that it is this man who represents, for Muslims, an ideal of humanity. It should therefore occasion no surprise that this ideal is used by some Muslims to justify acts of suicide bombing and the contemptuous use of “kuffar” women. Indeed, one imam in Oxford states the problem with unusual clarity when he points out that in many mosques, this kind of treatment of “kuffar” women is actually commended by many imams. This is reported in the Telegraph:

Continue reading

The Last Post

Standard

After much thought, I have decided, for the time being at least, to suspend operations on the blog. The blog posts will remain much as I have left them, although I have deleted some pictures, mainly of Elizabeth. This has been a labour of love, but it is not a permanent memorial to Elizabeth, and was never meant to be. So, for the sake of privacy I have decided not to include pictures of Elizabeth in what remains behind.

I want to thank everyone who has read and followed the blog, and the many who have made the discussions so rich and rewarding. Over the last two years and six months (or so) I have written something over 840 posts. I have backed up all the posts which I wrote myself, including the quotes which were included in them. The words come in total, to 1, 386, 095  words. That is surely enough for now. I do need to do other things, which constant attention to the blog has prevented me from doing, including, if it is still possible for me to do this at my age, to write a book about assisted dying. I have already mentioned my renewed interest in photography, and we will have to see where this leads me. I suspect that the reason that I found my transfer to Freethought Blops so distressing was the fact (although I did not know it at the time) that I was coming to the point where I did not want to be committed in the long term to the blog.

Once again, my thanks to all those faithful readers who have followed the blog over the last couple of years. You have been a great community of people, and have shown yourself to be intelligent, alive to the difficulties facing us in the world today, willing to think passionately and clearly about issues that concerned me, and I am grateful for your participation, without which this would have been a very lonely exercise in talking to myself. I offer you my heartfelt thanks.

I do this with great trepidation, striking off in a completely new direction, and my hands are trembling as I type these words. I feel a great sadness, but I do feel the need, nevertheless, to move on towards an unseen and unknown destination. I would like to thank, especially, Ophelia Benson and Jerry Coyne for their encouragement and support. In adding the military last post as a closing flourish, I do so full in the knowledge that this is a major ending of sorts in my life. It is remarkable how blogging can define a person. I hope those of you who are disappointed will not feel any sense of betrayal at my decision to move on. Thanks, once again, one and all.

The Last Post


Sunset and waves

The Design Argument

Standard

The following is deliberately short, punchy, and unqualified. Perhaps it will help move the discussion along, since it seems to have got bogged down.

On an earlier post two commenters have been duking it out over the argument from design. I do not intend to repeat their arguments and counterarguments here. There is a simple reason for this. The design argument cannot prove what it sets out to prove, and anyone who has thought about it for a moment must know why. According to one of the discussants, Rahman,

There must be a reason why the numbers are precisely aligned for life.

And, of course, no doubt there are — reasons, that is. But there is no obvious reason why we should think that there must be a — that is, just a single, quite overwhelming — reason why the numbers are precisely aligned for life. This is an illegitimate step in the argument.

Take the argument that the other discussant, Paxton, uses, to show that the argument from design is simply irrelevant to an explanation of how things are. AC Grayling uses this argument in his new book, The God Argument, and it basically goes like this. If you go back into the past and try to determine the reasons for things being as they are, you will come upon an entire series of quite contingent events. For instance, why are you here? In order to answer that question you will be taken on a long search though an unimaginably long series of quite contingent events, people being in the right place at the right time, being in the mood (or not) for sex, plus the completely chance occurrence of the sperm that resulted in you being born fertilized the egg instead another of the hundred or so thousand or million that might have, and that perfectly contingent event was in turn dependent upon similar quite contingent events going back, in an unbroken line, to the first denizens of early organic environments.

The problem is, quite simply, that the whole endeavour of a search for roots and reasons wouldn’t have started off unless you were here to set off on it. In other words, you are here. There are reasons why you are here, possibly many millions of them, and all of them quite contingent. You might well not have been here had one of the links in the chain have been slightly different. Someone else, or no one, might have been here in your place, and it would then be that person who would be (or perhaps not, since he or she might have different interests) setting off on the search for the …. Snark — is it?

Continue reading

Trying Out a New Camera

Standard

I have been absent without official leave for the last while, trying to deal with several things, not least was a fall that I took, prompted, I think, by a drug which was prescribed for a chronic condition that has plagued me for some time now. I have in fact debated with myself whether to continue with the blog or not, and the jury is still out on that. But one thing that I did decide to do was to buy some new camera equipment — at the cost of a small car! — and try to get back into photography again. Yesterday I was out trying out one of my new camera bodies — which has so many bells and whistles it’s hard just to take a picture without a degree in photography — a trip which resulted in some of the first scenic pictures I have taken since Elizabeth died, so it was a big move for me. I put a few of them here for those who might be interested. Since I was trying so many new things, and playing with different picture controls, some of them are less than stellar, but they did amuse me, and I hope they will amuse you too. They were all taken along a stretch of Nova Scotia coastline, most of them at Peggy’s Cove (though none of the Peggy’s Cove light), a famous tourist destination for visitors to Nova Scotia, and a place where Elizabeth and I used to go when we were first in love, so it has a special resonance for me. It’s the first time I have gone there by myself since May 2007, when we made a last nostalgic journey shortly before going to Switzerland. (Since I may take up photography more seriously I have attached copyright to the pictures, and will do so more regularly in the future, if I can get myself back into photography again.) The original files are a bit over 100 mb apiece, so these are drastically reduced in size.

Atlantic Thrasher Returns with the Catch (Lobsters)

Atlantic Thrasher Returns with the Catch of Lobsters (she had just come out of the fog bank)

Atlantic Thrasher at the Wharf

Atlantic Thrasher at the Wharf

Continue reading

Existential Blasphemy

Standard

As anyone who has read here on choiceindying.com will know, I do not have a great deal of respect for Andrew Brown, who writes for the Guardian. So of course I was not surprised to read his little piece about Katherine Welby’s (the new Archbishop of Canterbury’s daughter) depression. As a small taster, take the following words:

Katherine Welby’s remarkable blog post and interview about her depression rings true to anyone who has ever been ill in this way but it also illuminates the complex ways in which religious belief can twine round the condition, providing either a vine to tangle your feet in or a beanstalk to climb out on.

Now that, gentle reader, is all just puffery, nor is it clear in what way Katherine Welby’s “remarkable” blog post or interview (both linked in the quote from Brown) really does illuminate the complex ways in which religion helps or hinders those with depression. And that, I think, is perhaps the most telling thing about this. I certainly don’t wish Katherine Welby any harm, and hope she gets the help she needs for her depression, and if she finds hope in religion, well and good. But let’s not build this up into something of earth-shaking significance, please!

For the daughter of a priest, then bishop, then archbishop (a man who came to his religious vocation later in life), who herself read theology at university, it should not surprise anyone that Katherine Welby thinks in religious categories when she considers the ins and outs of the depression that has blighted her adult years. Having episodically suffered from depression myself, and even thought seriously about ending my life on several occasions, it does not surprise me that she has sought solace in religion, and in religious community. But the anodyne things that Brown says about Katherine Welby’s way of dealing with her depression — all of them gleaned from her blog – through Bible, faith, and church community, is pathetically shallow. Welby herself says that “the Bible is key,” because, as she justly points out, the Bible isn’t a story of perfect human beings in perfect accord with their lives, who go about praising god all day long. The Bible is unquestionably allzu menschlich, to use Nietzsche’s phrase — all too human. Entirely human in its questioning, doubting, failing, despairing … And to the extent that this can allow people to recognise and accept their humanity without condemnation, that’s all very well, of course. That’s a source of strength for Katherine Welby, as she says, and doubtless it can be.

But she acknowledges another side to this particular coin. If the Bible is all to human, it is also all too religious as well, and so it is not at all surprising that she has met with the shadow side of religion, where the accusing finger points at those who have not been able simply to fall back confidently into the supporting arms of Jesus. And, as Welby notes, this is not something that church people are particularly good at, that is, at being screwed up and depressed, without a rosy disposition and confidence in the future. But she doesn’t seem to see that she does the same thing, and her own words could easily be turned to the same purpose, and to box people in. Listen:

The bible is my key. Reading the psalms (that oh so regularly quoted ‘you can yell at God, look’ book) I find that I don’t need to have hope every second of the day. In my hopelessness I just need to acknowledge that God is bigger than my illness and he will come through – eventually. Not always easy, but always possible.

“He will always come through — eventually.” And that’s simply not so. Just because the book of Job ends up with Job being restored to health and good fortune, with daughters even more beautiful than the ones killed at the beginning of the story, doesn’t mean that Job ever sees a smidgeon of justice. Wealth is not an answer to disaster, nor is the declaration, ”I’m bigger than you — where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?” a particularly comforting response to the fact that I am finite, fallible and faulty.

Continue reading